A Rouge Point

I'm free to say whatever I like, if it's wrong or right it's alright

Did Cherry Go Too Far?

with 7 comments

It’s a question that has been asked many times before, and each time, in the eyes of CBC executives at least, the answer has always been no. Don Cherry’s 1st intermission segment, Coach’s Corner, returned to the CBC airwaves with the return of the National Hockey League last week. And after a summer where three NHL players took their own lives, Cherry wanted to make sure his views were well-known. The aftermath was a controversy surrounding Cherry that might be the biggest ever.

Cherry took issue with the claims of many hockey pundits that fighting in the National Hockey League may have led to depression, or other mental problems, which in turn resulted in the suicides of Wade Belak, Derek Boogaard and Rick Rypien. Here is a quote from Cherry.

Is that ridiculous, I’ll tell you one thing there, people that are against fighting you should be ashamed of yourself. You took advantage of that to make your point on fighting, you should be ashamed of yourself doing something like that.

He then followed that up by quoting TVA Sports analyst Georges Laraque, and taking three ex-NHL players, who were all fighters, to task.

But, the ones that I am disgusted with, and, I hate to say this when the kids are listening… They are a bunch of pukes that fought before: Stu Grimson, Chris Nilan and Jim Thomson. The reason, oh the reason that they’re drinking, drugs and alcoholic is because they fight. You turncoats, you hypocrites. The one thing that I’m not is a hypocrite. You guys, you were fighters and now you don’t want guys to make the same living you did.

I don’t think that Grimson, Nilan or Thomson deterring fighting is in any way being hypocritical. They know better than anyone else that it is a hard job and it can result in injury. Cherry did offer a half-hearted apology on Saturday night when he said he shouldn’t have called them “pukes”, which for me is very childish. He didn’t apologize for calling the trio “turncoats” or “hypocrites” though.

Cherry has bigger problems now though because, it turns out that neither Grimson or Nilan have ever linked fighting in hockey to drug and alcohol abuse. Shortly after the October 6 broadcast of Coach’s corner, Nilan Tweeted.

Nilan’s Tweet added fuel to the fire with fans who were already angry with Cherry’s message. Nilan confirmed that what Cherry said was worse than initially thought. It is fine for Cherry to express his opinion, but it turns out Nilan never said what Cherry accused him of. It is vital that commentators never misquote players, especially in a negative light.

On Friday afternoon Kirstine Stewart of the CBC responded to Cherry’s comments. To me, this is a sign that the CBC knows what Cherry said was wrong, even worth firing him for. Of course CBC doesn’t want to do fire him, so the next best option is damage control. It was poorly executed both by Stewart and Ron MacLean on Saturday’s broadcast. Here is what Stewart had to say.

While we support his right to voice that opinion, we do not share his position. Safety is a top priority for CBC, and we support the initiatives of the NHL and others in keeping players safe on and off the ice.

The story took another turn this morning with the news that Nilan, Grimson and Thomson are considering legal action against Cherry for his comments. Grimson is now an attorney in Nashville, so he is well-educated with lawsuits. Here is the statement released by the three today.

During CBC’s broadcast of Coach’s Corner on Oct. 6, 2011, Don Cherry inserted himself into a prominent debate involving the recent deaths of three (3) NHL players, drug addiction, alcohol abuse and mental illness. In doing so, Mr. Cherry targeted the above-named individuals, some of whom have suffered from such diseases, as a result of views they previously expressed. Mr. Cherry’s comments were more than inappropriate; they were baseless and slanderous. Furthermore, Mr. Cherry’s subsequent attempt to qualify his comments on Oct. 8, 2011, was entirely ineffectual. Mr. Cherry’s conduct throughout has demonstrated a complete lack of decency.

CBC had three options on Friday morning. The most extreme would have been to fire Cherry. They could have also suspended him from their broadcasts on Saturday and Sunday, which would have bought them some time to decide what to do. The third option, which is the one CBC chose, was to do nothing. While Cherry certainly does have the right to freedom of speech, CBC has no obligation to broadcast it.

My suggestion to CBC is to let Cherry finish the season. Then they should let him retire, while allowing him to come back for big events such as the All Star Game. Or they should bring in someone with an opposite viewpoint to counter what Cherry says. Regardless of what Ron MacLean thinks, he usually lets Cherry speak without any real argument.

Cherry is a good guy, he is right about a lot of things in hockey. However, he needs to learn when to keep quiet on certain issues. A better tribute to Belak, Boogaard and Rypien would have been to show some of their goals, shot blocks or hits and then say how much the game will miss them.

About these ads

Written by canadiansportsmedia

11 October, 2011 at 4:08pm

Posted in CBC Sports, NHL

7 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. [...] The Canadian Sports Media Blog asks if Don Cherry went too far. [...]

  2. I can’t remember where I heard it now, but someone said that the best thing Cherry could have done would be to say that he obviously supports fighting and big hits in the game but that the sport’s tough guys need to remember that there are more important things than fights and wins and they need to take care of themselves so as not to end up like the three guys who passed away this summer.

    That would’ve been the right move.

    WhitehorseJosh

    11 October, 2011 at 7:31pm

    • Holy run-on sentence.

      WhitehorseJosh

      13 October, 2011 at 3:16am

  3. Very good article. I agree almost 100%. CBC should not fire Cherry. He was ranked in the top 5 in an article in the Globe and Mail (or maybe it was National Post…) ranking the most quoted men in Canada. He is a Canadian hockey legend.

    The only thing I disagree with is to bring someone in to conquer his arguments. That is what makes Coach’s Corner so popular/watched. YOU get to argue with Cherry. You don’t watch 2 people argue with each other. There are too many sports shows like that (PTI, Around the Horn, etc.). YOU are the opposition. Ron MacLean is a dummy in Coach’s Corner.

    Also, Jim Thomson made a great analogy on Off the Record last Friday explaining why he is not a hypocrite. He compared it to smoking a cigarette. Everyone used to smoke, but then people stopped when new information was presented to them about how bad it was for them. Would one be a hypocrite if they said that smoking was bad for your health after they had done it for 20 years? No. So with all this new information about the negative effects of fighting, he is saying that the NHL should stop fighting because of all these negative effects. — (By the way, Off the Record has been great so far this year. I wasn’t much of a fan of it the last 5 or so years, but it has been GREAT this season. Michael Landsberg is really becoming a superb host.)

    Vlad

    12 October, 2011 at 1:14am

  4. Don’s a “traditionalist” in the hockey sense – he likes old-time, hard hitting, smash-mouth hockey. Wait a minute, isn’t that what football traditionalists like too?

    The fact is that both sports are changing with the times, in contradiction to the traditionalists. With more and more scientific evidence regarding the long-term effects of violent collisions vis-à-vis the brain, why wouldn’t major professional sports leagues make rule changes to mitigate the consequences? Don’t get me wrong, I love coma-inducing impacts as much as the next guy – but as someone who has suffered concussions in both sports at a competitive level, these changes are long overdue for the protection of players.

    Bottom line: Hit (or fight) to hurt if you want, but do it the right way.

    Chuck

    12 October, 2011 at 11:18am

  5. alas, finally some common sense from this people on this site as opposed to the CBC. I remember when you criticized Cherry on the CBC site, you always got a thumbs down. Now it seems everyone is giving him a thumbs down. Who are these people & why the sudden change.

    Cherry comes from a time where men were men unlike the sissies that we have today who cry when they fall down, or complain cuz they got hit. The problem with hockey is the equipment & Cherry talks about it but no one seems to be listening. Sure these guys are bigger, faster, & stronger but when you add plastic armoury then of course the collision is going to be drastic. HELLOOOO CHANGE THE EQUIPMENT!!!!!

    & as for these 3 goons maybe suing Grapes, suck it up you losers. I remember Grimson, he was a nut bar especially when he chased some guy all over the ice trying to beat him up. & now he is lawyer??

    Shut up & keep it to yourself. Grapes is the best.

    Bill

    12 October, 2011 at 3:46pm

  6. Did Cherry go to far, what?

    I think you meant “too”. ;)

    Mookie

    13 October, 2011 at 3:06am


What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: